Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Intercourse Assault Trial

Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Intercourse Assault Trial

Regarding the very first day’s an effort against a Norwalk police officer accused of intimately assaulting a 13-year-old woman, the alleged victim, now 20, took the witness stand and told the jury Anthony Santo stuck their hand down her pants and touched her intimately while her dad and sibling had been resting close to them.

Santo seemed on without feeling because the incident was described by the woman at state Superior Court in Stamford. Santo had been an 18-year person in the Norwalk Police Department before October of 2009 as he ended up being arrested on fees of second-degree intimate attack and threat of problems for a kid. He has got been on unpaid administrative leave since their arrest.

The alleged victim stated Santo had been a friend that is close of family and invested lots of time at their residence in Greenwich. The girl stated she could inform Santo things she could perhaps not discuss along with her “strict moms and dads” and described Santo as her “second dad. “

The lady ended up being struggling to identify the date that is exact of attack, but stated she ended up being about 13 at that time. The witness stated she was at her pajamas sitting for a sofa inside her family room additionally the two was dealing with masturbation or becoming groped by another boy whenever Santo touched her. The lady said there was an electric outage that and her father and brother may have been sleeping on a mattress in the living room when the incident took place night.

The lady stated she would not inform anybody in regards to the event until belated 2007, when she told her boyfriend.

During the time, the lady stated she had been therefore young she failed to realize something bad had happened, although she stated she instantly went to your restroom to get by herself.

“I didn’t know very well what was happening, I didn’t comprehend the emotions I happened to be having … we did not know it absolutely was incorrect. I did not know any thing, ” she stated.

Right before your ex and Santo had been to just simply just take a visit together to Florida to check out a family member of Santo’s in July 2009, the boyfriend called authorities and reported the intimate attack she described to him significantly more than a year earlier in the day.

Santo, who has got remained free on $25,000 relationship since their arrest, would sporadically lean in to sex chat adultchathookups keep in touch with their lawyer, Gary Mastronardi, during the roughly 90 mins of testimony your ex provided each morning.

Moments after Mastronardi started their cross examination, the lady started to cry after she made the allegation against Santo, a close friend as she was asked in a stern tone why her father was angry with her.

“He had been upset with you because he failed to think you. He did not think your tale, ” Mastronardi stated.

Judge Richard Comerford then provided your ex a few mins to write by by herself before continuing.

Whenever Mastronardi started once more, he asked to truly have the question that is same, but an objection to a follow-up led Comerford to clear the jury from the courtroom.

Prior to lunch, Mastronardi outlined their strategy during a disagreement with senior Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Ornousky about how precisely far to the woman’s dating history he is in a position to go while defending Santo.

Mastronardi stated he desired to phone witnesses to buttress their concept that the lady had made within the story concerning the intimate attack to make her boyfriend jealous.

“My place is she managed to get up. I am maybe maybe not attempting to soil her reputation, ” stated Mastronardi, adding that by participating in this bid for envy, she dragged an innocent individual as a unlawful cost.

Mastronardi stated while wanting to alert law enforcement from the instance, perhaps the woman’s dad stated the jealous boyfriend “plugged Tony Santo involved with it. “

Mastronardi stated your ex had comprised another severe intimate allegation about someone else, but authorities selected never to prosecute the so-called perpetrator of the sexual attack as the story was so bizarre it may never be thought.

More witnesses is going to be called in the event expected to use the remaining portion of the to decide week.

Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Intercourse Assault Trial

Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Intercourse Assault Trial

Regarding the very first day’s an effort against a Norwalk police officer accused of intimately assaulting a 13-year-old woman, the alleged victim, now 20, took the witness stand and told the jury Anthony Santo stuck their hand down her pants and touched her intimately while her dad and sibling had been resting close to them.

Santo seemed on without feeling because the incident was described by the woman at state Superior Court in Stamford. Santo had been an 18-year person in the Norwalk Police Department before October of 2009 as he ended up being arrested on fees of second-degree intimate attack and threat of problems for a kid. He has got been on unpaid administrative leave since their arrest.

The alleged victim stated Santo had been a friend that is close of family and invested lots of time at their residence in Greenwich. The girl stated she could inform Santo things she could perhaps not discuss along with her “strict moms and dads” and described Santo as her “second dad. “

The lady ended up being struggling to identify the date that is exact of attack, but stated she ended up being about 13 at that time. The witness stated she was at her pajamas sitting for a sofa inside her family room additionally the two was dealing with masturbation or becoming groped by another boy whenever Santo touched her. The lady said there was an electric outage that and her father and brother may have been sleeping on a mattress in the living room when the incident took place night.

The lady stated she would not inform anybody in regards to the event until belated 2007, when she told her boyfriend.

During the time, the lady stated she had been therefore young she failed to realize something bad had happened, although she stated she instantly went to your restroom to get by herself.

“I didn’t know very well what was happening, I didn’t comprehend the emotions I happened to be having … we did not know it absolutely was incorrect. I did not know any thing, ” she stated.

Right before your ex and Santo had been to just simply just take a visit together to Florida to check out a family member of Santo’s in July 2009, the boyfriend called authorities and reported the intimate attack she described to him significantly more than a year earlier in the day.

Santo, who has got remained free on $25,000 relationship since their arrest, would sporadically lean in to sex chat adultchathookups keep in touch with their lawyer, Gary Mastronardi, during the roughly 90 mins of testimony your ex provided each morning.

Moments after Mastronardi started their cross examination, the lady started to cry after she made the allegation against Santo, a close friend as she was asked in a stern tone why her father was angry with her.

“He had been upset with you because he failed to think you. He did not think your tale, ” Mastronardi stated.

Judge Richard Comerford then provided your ex a few mins to write by by herself before continuing.

Whenever Mastronardi started once more, he asked to truly have the question that is same, but an objection to a follow-up led Comerford to clear the jury from the courtroom.

Prior to lunch, Mastronardi outlined their strategy during a disagreement with senior Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Ornousky about how precisely far to the woman’s dating history he is in a position to go while defending Santo.

Mastronardi stated he desired to phone witnesses to buttress their concept that the lady had made within the story concerning the intimate attack to make her boyfriend jealous.

“My place is she managed to get up. I am maybe maybe not attempting to soil her reputation, ” stated Mastronardi, adding that by participating in this bid for envy, she dragged an innocent individual as a unlawful cost.

Mastronardi stated while wanting to alert law enforcement from the instance, perhaps the woman’s dad stated the jealous boyfriend “plugged Tony Santo involved with it. “

Mastronardi stated your ex had comprised another severe intimate allegation about someone else, but authorities selected never to prosecute the so-called perpetrator of the sexual attack as the story was so bizarre it may never be thought.

More witnesses is going to be called in the event expected to use the remaining portion of the to decide week.